キャミー・タング著「戌年」連載小説 プロのドッグトレーナーであるマリ・ムトウは、厄年を迎えている。 犬小屋と訓練所の改築をしながら、いつも不服そうにしている家族と同居することになった。母と姉に言わせれば、犬の毛とよだれかけにまみれる仕事は、家族にとって恥ずべきものだという。彼女は元カレを説得し、数ヶ月間犬を預かってもらうことにした。しかし、彼の兄は、数週間前に彼女が誤って車に追突した、怒り狂ったセキュリティ専門家であることが判明する。 アシュウィン・ケイトウは十分な問題を抱えている。叔母が玄関先に現れ、同居を希望している。彼は彼女にすべてを借りているので、断ることができません。母親が家を出て行った後、ネルおばさんはアシュウィンと弟を引き取り、愛のあるキリスト教の家庭で育てた。しかも、弟のダスティもアパートを追い出され、居場所を求めている。しかし、彼は犬を飼っている。そして、その犬の飼い主は誰だと思いますか？ しかし、旧友でオアフ島のノースショアでデイスパを経営する私立探偵のエディサ・ゲレロから依頼を受ける。マリの施設で奇妙な破壊行為があり、3年前に失踪したエディサの妹の財布を発見する。エディサはマリが危険な目に遭っているのではと心配する。警備の専門家であるアシュウィンがすでにマリを知っていることを知ったエディサは、忙しい若い女性を密かに監視することを彼に依頼する。 アシュウィンは、活発でのんびりとしたドッグトレーナーに不本意ながら惹かれていく。彼女は、幸せそうな母親を思い出させる。その母親の裏切りによって、彼は人と距離を置くようになったのだ。マリは、アシュウィンの冷たい外見を見抜き、彼が家族に忠実な男であることを認める。彼は、彼女のキャリア選択を批判するだけの母親や姉とは違う。 マリのバラバラな家庭とアシュウィンのバラバラな家庭の中で、過去を隠そうとする人たちから、彼らの周りに危険が迫ってくるようになる。彼らは、影で動く秘密に光を当てることができるのか？ 過去に発表されたパートへのリンクはこちら。 *** 第8章 - 恐ろしくも真っ白な不動産書類 『みんな仲良くできないのかな？』 マリは無用に力を込めて箱に本を投げ入れた。最近、なぜ彼女は人生の中で全員と言い争いをしているのだろう？もしかすると、これは本当に悪いアイデア
Captain's Log, Stardate 01.16.2008
(The winner of the rat mug is Carol (mittens)! Congratulations!)
I Tivo'd Jane Austen's Persuasion presented on Masterpiece and finally got a chance to see it last night.
Maybe because I've read the book so many times and love it so much, maybe because I'm a bit of a Jane Austen purist, I was disappointed. While I liked the actors in general--and I liked the actors who played Anne and Frederick very much--I disliked the writing quite a bit (the parts not taken directly from Jane Austen). I didn't like the inconsistencies with the novel.
There were a few inconsistencies in the 1995 version of Sense and Sensibility, but I loved them because they seemed to add to the story without deviating much from the novel.
For this version of Persuasion, I didn't like the changes and thought they deviated too much--the inconsistencies changed the characters themselves.
Charles Musgrove is suddenly as unpleasant as his wife. Walter Elliot is suddenly not as silly and stupid as he was in the novel--instead, he's mean and snobby. Mrs. Clay is attractive rather than plain, so Sir Elliot doesn't dislike her in the movie as he did in the novel, which makes the watcher wonder why Elizabeth doesn't worry about the possibility of a relationship. Elizabeth suddenly notices Mr. Elliot's pursuit of Anne and rants about it. Lady Russell is shown as less self-assured, more insecure, and possibly devious--something she never was in the novel. Mrs. Smith is suddenly not an invalid and runs with Anne for a block down Camden Place (and how could Anne get away with running in a public place like that?).
I liked the 1995 version of Persuasion, although the characters were a bit older than described in the book. The writing conveyed the story faithfully and cleverly, and the few deviations didn't jolt me out of the movie like the 2008 version.
I wanted to like this newer version--I was so excited about it. And while I really liked the actors in general, the writing disappointed me too much.
Should I not be such a Jane Austen purist? I'm wondering if I'm being too harsh. This is my favorite Austen novel, and I've read it so many times I almost know it by heart. I know which lines from the movie were taken from the book, and which weren't. Okay, I admit, that's kind of scary.
(The winner of the rat mug is Carol (mittens)! Congratulations!)
I Tivo'd Jane Austen's Persuasion presented on Masterpiece and finally got a chance to see it last night.Maybe because I've read the book so many times and love it so much, maybe because I'm a bit of a Jane Austen purist, I was disappointed. While I liked the actors in general--and I liked the actors who played Anne and Frederick very much--I disliked the writing quite a bit (the parts not taken directly from Jane Austen). I didn't like the inconsistencies with the novel.
There were a few inconsistencies in the 1995 version of Sense and Sensibility, but I loved them because they seemed to add to the story without deviating much from the novel.
For this version of Persuasion, I didn't like the changes and thought they deviated too much--the inconsistencies changed the characters themselves.
Charles Musgrove is suddenly as unpleasant as his wife. Walter Elliot is suddenly not as silly and stupid as he was in the novel--instead, he's mean and snobby. Mrs. Clay is attractive rather than plain, so Sir Elliot doesn't dislike her in the movie as he did in the novel, which makes the watcher wonder why Elizabeth doesn't worry about the possibility of a relationship. Elizabeth suddenly notices Mr. Elliot's pursuit of Anne and rants about it. Lady Russell is shown as less self-assured, more insecure, and possibly devious--something she never was in the novel. Mrs. Smith is suddenly not an invalid and runs with Anne for a block down Camden Place (and how could Anne get away with running in a public place like that?).
I liked the 1995 version of Persuasion, although the characters were a bit older than described in the book. The writing conveyed the story faithfully and cleverly, and the few deviations didn't jolt me out of the movie like the 2008 version.
I wanted to like this newer version--I was so excited about it. And while I really liked the actors in general, the writing disappointed me too much.Should I not be such a Jane Austen purist? I'm wondering if I'm being too harsh. This is my favorite Austen novel, and I've read it so many times I almost know it by heart. I know which lines from the movie were taken from the book, and which weren't. Okay, I admit, that's kind of scary.
Comments
Although it has it's good points, it's still not as good as I thought it would be. :(
Oh well. I have high hopes for the new versions of Northanger Abby, Mansfield Park, and Sense & Sensibility.
and Rupert Penry-jones was a hunk!
i am looking forward to the rest of the other Austen adaptations Masterpiece will be doing in the next few weeks.
oh and off topic: today i received from zondervan a brochure about your books. unfortunately USPS nearly shredded it through the mailing process so i received in pieces in one of their "we're sorry, it happens" enevelopes. from what i've been able to put together, it looks good!
And why shouldn't you be a Jane Austen purist???