Skip to main content

This makes me mad.

Here’s a link to an article about Amazon.com that I got from Mary Keeley of Books and Such Literary Agency. Why is Amazon doing this to publishers? This is so unfair. Amazon is trying to make these publishers agree to terms that would make the publishers lose money, in order for Amazon to make money off of other products in their arsenal. If the publishers don’t agree, Amazon can just stop ordering from them and the publishers lose money anyway. What kind of a business practice is that? Amazon doesn’t NEED to sell all their titles so cheaply. They’re already making money off of bestsellers. Amazon is acting like a bully. Maybe this is petty of me, but I'm going to stop buying books from Amazon for a little while. >:(

Comments

I already don't like the practice of the author's signing with Amazon for the first 3 months. I know many of my Indie author's are not doing that so I can get their books on NOOK.
Camy Tang said…
I didn't know that. That's not very nice of Amazon. Authors already have such a hard time making any money off of their books, and Amazon is limiting them.
Iola said…
My understanding is that is only if people sign with the Kindle Direct Programme, which obviously gives them some other advantages, otherwise they wouldn't be doing it! However, the Writer Beware blog did do a post on the KDP, warning authors about this practice.

I was under the impression that self-published KDP authors earn a 70% royalty of Amazon e-books, which probably explains why they are prepared to sign up to a monopoly situation. I was under the impression that most traditionally-published authors got royalties in the 15% - 20% region, even for e-books, so the KDP obviously has advantages.
Camy Tang said…
Anytime you self-publish, you'll get a higher royalty rate than traditional publishing. But traditional publishing also has distribution connections that you otherwise have to pay for with self-publishing, whereas traditional publishing, you don't pay them, they pay you, and they do most of the production work (editing, cover, etc.). I've done both. In general I prefer traditional publishing because I'm really quite lazy and don't want to do any of that work myself!
FredTownWard said…
It seems to me there are a couple of entirely different things going on here that therefore must be considered separately.

On the one hand Amazon clearly has the corporate manners of a troll, for which there simply is no excuse. It seemed to me that something like half the complaints were not so much for what Amazon did but for how they did it: threateningly, impersonally, suddenly, and uncompromisingly. Business is business, but it is simply BAD business to anger people unnecessarily like this; doing so generates hard feelings and, eventually, competitors. How smart is it in the long term to make these sudden, selfish, bullying moves in the public eye when, according to the article, Amazon has been forced to back down in about half the cases. It's a spoonful of sugar that makes the medicine go down, Mr. Bezos, not a knee to the groin.

On the other hand there is clearly a lot of self-serving sob story going on here as well. It is worth remembering that Amazon's EVIL plan, stripped of its bad behavior, is simply to win you and me as customers by selling us the products we want at a lower price than anyone else can while still making money hand over fist.

The horror, the horror....

Same thing with authors. Amazon isn't really trying to cheat them (What good would that do Amazon?), rather it is trying to entice them with ideas on how they can make MORE money per book sale, together, by eliminating the middleman. Of course this path isn't for everyone, but truth is, a good deal less than a majority of would-be authors ever get the choice of traditional publishing or self-publishing. For most would-be authors it is going to end up being self-publish (with all the limitations and difficulties therein)...

or don't publish... at all.

Finally, it is worth remembering that traditional publishers and independent booksellers got into this mess in the first place because of bad corporate behavior of their own. A commentator whose name is lost to history said it better than I can,

"Amazon has a lot of faults, but at least they don't sneer at my choice of reading material."

Too many independent booksellers did and still do so, which is why so many of their customers abandoned them, first for the big box stores, and later for Amazon.

As for traditional publishers, every single successful niche or genre publisher and every single successful self-published author is a testament to something they didn't see coming, lost a lot of money because of, and ended up stuck being Johnny come lately's watching somebody else make the money they passed on.
Camy Tang said…
I agree with you about booksellers, I've experienced that myself. I'm not knocking self publishing or booksellers, but it annoys me that Amazon is bullying publishers this way. They wouldn't go to Lays and say, Hey, sell us your potato chips for 45% off or else.

Popular Posts

Chinese Take-Out and Sushi for One

Captain’s Log, Supplemental My agent sent me an article from Publisher’s Weekly that discussed this incident: Chinese Take-Out Spawns Christian Controversy And here’s also a blog post that talks about it in more detail: The Fighting 44s This is Soong-Chan Rah’s blog: The PCS blog In sum: Apparently Zondervan (yes, my publisher), who has partnered with Youth Specialties, had put out a youth leaders skit that had stereotypical Asian dialogue, which offended many Christian Asian Americans. In response to the outcry, Zondervan/Youth Specialities put out a sincere apology and is not only freezing the remaining stock of the book, but also reprinting it and replacing the copies people have already bought. I am very proud of my publisher for how they have handled this situation. The skit writers have also issued a public apology . (I feel sorry for them, because they were only trying to write a funny skit, not stir up this maelstrom of internet controversy. I’ve been in youth work long enou...

Toilet seat cover

Captain’s Log, Supplemental Update August 2008: I wrote up the pattern for this with "improvements"! Here's the link to my No Cold Bums toilet seat cover ! Okay, remember a few days ago I was complaining about the cold toilet seat in my bathroom? Well, I decided to knit a seat cover. Not a lid cover, but a seat cover. I went online and couldn’t find anything for the seat, just one pattern for the lid by Feminitz.com . However, I took her pattern for the inside edge of the lid cover and modified it to make a seat cover. Here it is! It’s really ugly stitch-wise because originally I made it too small and had to extend it a couple inches on each side. I figured I’d be the one staring at it, so who cared if the extension wasn’t perfectly invisible? I used acrylic yarn since, well, that’s what I had, and also because it’s easy to wash. I’ll probably have to wash this cover every week or so, but it’s easy to take off—I made ties which you can see near the back of the seat. And...

No Cold Bums toilet seat cover

Captain's Log, Stardate 08.22.2008 I actually wrote out my pattern! I was getting a lot of hits on my infamous toilet seat cover , and I wanted to make a new one with “improvements,” so I paid attention and wrote things down as I made the new one. This was originally based off the Potty Mouth toilet cover , but I altered it to fit over the seat instead of the lid. Yarn: any worsted weight yarn, about 120 yards (this is a really tight number, I used exactly 118 yards. My suggestion is to make sure you have about 130 yards.) I suggest using acrylic yarn because you’re going to be washing this often. Needle: I used US 8, but you can use whatever needle size is recommended by the yarn you’re using. Gauge: Not that important. Mine was 4 sts/1 inch in garter stitch. 6 buttons (I used some leftover shell buttons I had in my stash) tapestry needle Crochet hook (optional) Cover: Using a provisional cast on, cast on 12 stitches. Work in garter st until liner measures...

Excerpt - A HUNDRED YEARS OF HAPPINESS by Nicole Seitz

Captain's Log, Stardate 03.05.2009 Update: Sorry, this giveaway is closed. A Hundred Years of Happiness by Nicole Seitz A beautiful young woman. An American soldier. A war-torn country. Nearly forty years of silence. Now, two daughters search for the truth they hope will set them free and the elusive peace their parents have never found. In the South Carolina Lowcountry, a young mother named Katherine Ann is struggling to help her tempestuous father, by plunging into a world of secrets he never talks about. A fry cook named Lisa is trying desperately to reach her grieving Vietnamese mother, who has never fully adjusted to life in the States. And somewhere far away, a lost soul named Ernest is drifting, treading water, searching for what he lost on a long-ago mountain. They're all longing for connection. For the war that touched them to finally end. For their hundred years of happiness at long last to begin. From the beloved author of The Spirit of Sweetgrass...

Brainstorm - character occupation

Captain's Log, Stardate 03.23.2009 Hey guys, I could use some help. In my current manuscript, The Year of the Dog , which is a humorous contemporary romance, I have a minor character, Eddie. He’s my heroine’s ex-boyfriend, and they’re on good terms with each other. He’s a bit irresponsible, but not so much so that he’s a complete loser. He’s got a very easy going attitude, he forgets to pay his bills sometimes, he’s friendly and charming. He’s adventurous and fun to be around, but he’s a little forgetful sometimes, and he tends to spend a little outside his income. I need an occupation for him. What would a charming, easy going, slightly irresponsible guy do for a living? He’s not too irresponsible, because otherwise readers will wonder what in the world my heroine saw in him to date him in the first place. She was attracted to his charm, his easy going attitude (her family’s uptight, and he was a nice contrast), and his adventurousness. But his forgetfulness and irresponsibility ...